| In a comprehensive review of breast
cancer detection methods, a committee of scientists report that standard film mammography is still the best available method to detect
breast cancer. Mammography helps detect approximately 85% of all breast cancers and has
contributed to a 2% annual decline in breast cancer deaths in the past 10 years. Despite
the overall effectiveness of mammography, the scientists acknowledge that mammography can
miss breast cancer in a small percentage of women or falsely indicate cancer in others,
leading to unnecessary breast biopsies. Therefore, the
committee recommends that further research investigate better methods of breast cancer
detection. At the same time, underprivileged women should be given better access to
existing breast cancer screening technology.
"With all its limitations, film mammography
remains the gold standard against which new imaging technologies will be measured,"
said Joyce C. Lashof, MD, FACP, in an Institute of Medicine/National Academy of Sciences
news release. "To date, no quantum leap has been made in this area. At the same time,
many of the newer tools offer certain advantages and deserve to be studied further,"
said Dr. Lashof, who chaired the Committee on Technologies for Early Detection of Breast
Cancer. The report was released by the U.S. Institute of Medicine and National Research
Council of the National Academies in March 2001.
According to the report, no technology
is 100% accurate in detecting all breast cancers or abnormalities. In fact, using several
different technologies is often the best way to detect breast cancer. While mammography is
currently the only exam approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to screen
for breast cancer in women with no signs of the disease, other technologies (such as ultrasound or magnetic resonance imaging,
MRI) may be useful in further investigating abnormalities detected with mammography.
| Exam |
Pros |
Cons |
Ultrasound
(sonogram) |
Good
contrast resolution, excellent for identifying non-cancerous cysts or dense mass. |
Lacks
spatial resolution, operator dependent, cannot detect calcifications (may indicate
cancer). |
Breast MRI
(magnetic resonance
imaging) |
Good
at imaging dense breasts, implants or small lesions, helps stage extent of cancer. |
Long
and costly exam, difficult to differentiate between cancerous and benign lesions, cannot
detect calcifications. |
However, the scientists also expressed
concern that technologies approved as diagnostic breast exams may not be effective screening
tools. They recommended that the FDA base their approval and coverage of new screening
technologies on scientific data gathered from clinical
trials and that these trials be organized in conjunction with the appropriate federal
agencies and breast cancer organizations. Additionally, the National Cancer Institute
(NCI) should sponsor clinical trials every 10 to 15 years to re-evaluate the effectiveness
of existing technologies, such as mammography. Because the U.S. population is rapidly
aging, the NCI should also investigate whether mammography screening would be beneficial
to women over age 70.
In the meantime, women should be given
greater access to mammography to help screen for breast cancer. Currently, the Centers for
Disease Control and Preventions (CDC) Breast and Cervical Cancer Prevention and
Treatment Act provides free mammograms and Pap
smears to approximately 15% of financially underprivileged women. However, the
scientists recommend setting the goal of reaching 70% of these women. Former President
Clinton also signed a bill last October 2000 that requires
Medicare to cover the cost of treatment for women diagnosed with breast or cervical cancer
as a result of the government screening program.
While mammography is currently the most
effective method of detecting technology, the committee did acknowledge that mammography
has its limitations. For instance, mammography can miss up to 15% of breast cancers,
especially in young women with dense breasts (density shows up as white regions on
mammogram films and can eclipse cancer). Furthermore, while mammography can detect many
early-stage breast cancers, some fast-growing cancers may not
be visible on a mammogram film when they are still small enough to be treated effectively.
Conversely, the number of breast
abnormalities and cancers detected in women has risen significantly since routine
mammography was implemented. The scientists admit that the early detection of
abnormalities will be problematic until there is a better understanding of the biology and
genetics of these abnormalities. Until physicians are able to distinguish between those
abnormalities that will progress to invasive cancer (and require treatment) and those
which will never become a threat (and thus do not require treatment), breast cancer
screening will contribute to an inevitable overdiagnosis and overtreatment of some breast
abnormalities. At the same time, the committee emphasizes that improved detection methods
and treatment advances have helped to reduce the number of deaths from breast cancer in
the last decade.
Until more improved screening methods
exist, women should follow the American Cancer Societys guidelines to help detect
breast cancer early when the chances for successful treatment and survival are the
greatest:
- All women between 20 and 39 years of age
should practice monthly breast self-exams and have physician
performed clinical breast exams at least every three
years.
- All women 40 years of age and older
should have annual screening mammograms, practice monthly breast self-exams, and have
yearly clinical breast exams. The clinical breast exam should be conducted close to and
preferably before the scheduled mammogram.
Younger women with a family or personal
history of breast cancer should talk to their physicians about beginning annual mammograms
before age 40.
Additional Resources and References
- The March 8, 2001 Institute of
Medicine/National Academy of Sciences news release, "New Technologies for Breast
Cancer Detection Demand More Study; Film Mammography Remains Gold Standard," and
information on how to order the full report is available at http://www4.nas.edu/onpi/webextra.nsf/web/brcancer?OpenDocument
- The New York Times report,
"Scientific Review Backs Mammograms" was published on March 9, 2001, http://www.nytimes.com/
- The USA Today report by Rita
Rubin, "Cancer Study Cites Overdiagnosis," was published on March 9, 2001,
http://www.usatoday.com/
- To learn more about mammography, please
visit http://www.imaginis.com/breasthealth/mammography.asp
- To learn more about supplemental breast
imaging exams, such as ultrasound or MRI, please visit http://www.imaginis.com/breasthealth/menu-diagnosis.asp
- The Imaginis report, The Case for
Mammography: What One Flawed Study and Critics of the Exam Dont Address," is
available at http://www.imaginis.com/breasthealth/rebuttal.asp
|